Johnson v. Montpelier One LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20205:19-cv-06214California2,304 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

SCOTT JOHNSON,

8 Case No. 19-cv-06214-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER RE CONVERTED MOTION v. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 10 JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO

MONTPELIER ONE LLC, DISMISS

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 21 12

13 Defendant Montpelier One LLC was sued by Plaintiff Scott Johnson for failing to ensure 14 the real property at 2380 Montpelier Drive, San Jose, California complied with the accessibility 15 requirements imposed by the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh 16 Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). This is the Court’s second order regarding Defendant’s motion to 17 dismiss the suit, which the Court has converted in part into a motion for summary judgment. See 18 Dkt. No. 28. Plaintiff has now had an opportunity to request deferral of the Court’s summary 19 judgment ruling and to respond to the evidence Defendant attached to its Reply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.