Kimner

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

AUDREY L. KIMNER,

8 Case No. 5:19-cv-07576-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 10 v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

CAPITAL TITLE OF TEXAS, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants.

sa. 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Audrey Kimner’s motion for reconsideration.’ Plaintiff asks

14 || this Court to reconsider its March 2020 order, which dismissed Plaintiffs claims with prejudice. © 3 15 || See Dkt. 16. Plaintiff subsequently appealed that order.” Dkt. 17. 16 Reconsideration of a final judgment, order, or proceeding is appropriate if the district court

17 || (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence; (2) committed clear error or the initial decision

18 || was manifestly unjust; or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law. See, e.g., School 19 || Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255,…