Kimner

Kimner v. Capital Title of Texas, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20205:19-cv-07576California449 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

AUDREY L. KIMNER,

Case No. 5:19-cv-07576-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

CAPITAL TITLE OF TEXAS, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants.

sa. Before the Court is Plaintiff Audrey Kimner’s motion for reconsideration.’ Plaintiff asks

|| this Court to reconsider its March 2020 order, which dismissed Plaintiffs claims with prejudice. © || See Dkt. 16. Plaintiff subsequently appealed that order.” Dkt. 17. Reconsideration of a final judgment, order, or proceeding is appropriate if the district court

|| (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence; (2) committed clear error or the initial decision

|| was manifestly unjust; or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law. See, e.g., School || Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.