Ramos
Ramos v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GLEN J. RAMOS, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01433-MMC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
v. MOTION FOR REMAND; VACATING
HEARING
U.S. BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
12 Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand, filed May 22, 2020, by which motion plaintiffs seek an order remanding the above-titled action to state court, based on lack of diversity jurisdiction and the doctrine of abstention established in Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943). Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) has filed opposition; plaintiffs have not filed a reply. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision on the parties’ respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for July 10, 2020, and rules as follows. First, contrary to plaintiffs’ argument, Chase has met its burden of showing diversity of…