Leubner

Leubner v. County of Lake

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20204:18-cv-05654California10,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MILOS LEUBNER, Case No. 18-cv-05654-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 41

Before the court is defendant County of Lake’s (“Lake County”), defendant Dennis Keithly’s (“Keithly”), and defendant Michael Penhall’s (“Penhall”) (collectively, “defendants”) motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Milos Leubner’s (“plaintiff”) second amended complaint (“Dkt. 38” or “SAC”). Dkt. 41. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a resident of Lake County, California. He and others who live at his 21 residence purportedly use marijuana for medicinal purposes. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.