Leubner
Leubner v. County of Lake
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MILOS LEUBNER, Case No. 18-cv-05654-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND
COUNTY OF LAKE, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 41
Before the court is defendant County of Lake’s (“Lake County”), defendant Dennis Keithly’s (“Keithly”), and defendant Michael Penhall’s (“Penhall”) (collectively, “defendants”) motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Milos Leubner’s (“plaintiff”) second amended complaint (“Dkt. 38” or “SAC”). Dkt. 41. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a resident of Lake County, California. He and others who live at his 21 residence purportedly use marijuana for medicinal purposes. On…