Young

Young v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20204:19-cv-01965California18,708 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 MARCELL YOUNG, Case No. 19-cv-01965-PJH 8 Plaintiff,

9 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION AND REMANDING FOR

10 ANDREW SAUL, FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17 12

13 14 Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff Marcell Young (“plaintiff”) seeks judicial 15 review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner” or “defendant”) final 16 decision denying his claims for disability benefits and Supplemental Security Income 17 (“SSI”). This action is before the court on the parties’ motions for summary judgment. 18 Having considered the parties’ motions, the pertinent legal authorities, and having 19 reviewed the administrative record, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion and hereby 20 REMANDS this action to defendant’s assigned administrative law judge for further 21 proceedings in accordance with this order. 22 BACKGROUND 23 A. Procedural History 24 On May 18, 2015, plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.