Leake
Leake v. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HEATHER L.,1 Case No. 19-cv-02483-SI
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10 ANDREW SAUL,2 Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 22 11 Defendant.
12 13 In this Social Security appeal, plaintiff Heather L. seeks a finding that she was disabled for 14 a closed period from May 31, 2013, through April 21, 2017. Dkt. No. 16. Defendant opposes and 15 cross-moves for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 22. Having considered the parties’ papers and the 16 administrative record, the Court hereby REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner of Social 17 Security and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 18 19 BACKGROUND 20 I. Procedural History 21 In April 2015, plaintiff Heather L. filed a protective application for Social Security Disability 22 Insurance Benefits (“SSDI” or “DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act.3 Administrative 23 1 The Court partially redacts…