Funk
Funk v. Bank of Hawaii
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 LEIR FUNK, Case No. 20-cv-01378-BLF
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 9 v. REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
AND COSTS
10 BANK OF HAWAII, et al., [Re: ECF 28] 11 Defendants.
12 13 Before the court is Plaintiff Leire Funk’s Request for Attorney’s Fees and Costs at ECF 11. 14 For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is GRANTED. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Plaintiff Leire Funk brings this action against Bank of Hawai’i (“BOH”) and MTGLQ 17 Investors, L.P. (“MTGLQ”) (together “Defendants”) alleging unlawful conduct related to 18 Defendants’ foreclosure of Plaintiff’s real property. Exh. A to Am. Notice of Removal (“Compl.”), 19 ECF 16. On February 24, 2020, BOH removed this action from California state court based on 20 diversity jurisdiction. See ECF 1. On March 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for remand challenging 21 BOH’s basis for establishing diversity…