Silverman

Silverman v. Lane

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20205:18-cv-04510California7,440 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACOB SILVERMAN, Case No. 18-04510 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13

14 DORSEY LANE, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 (Docket No. 75) 17

18 Plaintiff, a California state pretrial detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against officers at the Humboldt County Correctional Facility 20 (“HCCF”). The Court found the complaint, Dkt. No. 1, stated cognizable claims and 21 ordered the matter served on Defendants Lane, Ayala, and Twitchell.1 Dkt. No. 13. 22

23 1 As their first response, Defendants Davin Twitchell and Brenda Ayala filed a motion to 24 dismiss, Dkt. No. 33, which the Court granted in part and denied in part. Dkt. No 54. The Court dismissed the excessive force claim against Defendant Twitchell and ordered him 25 terminated from the action. Id. at 5-6. Having denied Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend, the Court ordered the matter to proceed solely on the excessive force claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.