In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 In re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation Case No. 19-cv-05822-WHA (RMI)

9

ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE

10 MOTION TO SEAL

11 *This document relates to all actions* Re: Dkt. No. 288

12

13 14 Plaintiffs have moved to seal a number of exhibits to a jointly-filed discovery letter brief 15 which consist of privilege logs provided by Defendants Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Lupin 16 Ltd. (collectively, “Lupin”). See Admin. Mtn. to Seal (dkt. 288) at 2-3. In their own motion to 17 seal, Plaintiffs submit that they do not believe these exhibits need to be sealed at all (see id. at 2), 18 but have nevertheless moved to seal the entirety of each of these privilege log exhibits because 19 they were advised to do so by Lupin until such time that Lupin has “more time” to offer its 20 suggestions as to proposed redactions. Id. at 2. 21 Courts in this circuit begin the analysis of such issues with the proposition that there is a 22 strong presumption in favor of…