Tabler

Tabler v. Panera LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20205:19-cv-01646California7,340 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 BRIANNA TABLER, Case No. 19-CV-01646-LHK

13 Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE

14 v. TO AMEND1

15 PANERA LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 44 16 Defendant. 17 18 Before the Court is Defendant Panera LLC’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 44. Having 19 considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court 20 GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 A. Factual Background 23 Plaintiff Brianna Tabler is a citizen of Santa Clara County, California. ECF No. 41 ¶ 65 24 (“FAC” or “First Amended Complaint”). Defendant Panera LLC is a limited liability company 25 that was formed under the laws of New York and maintains headquarters in New York City. Id. 26 27 1 This order supersedes ECF No. 53, which was vacated. 1 §| 72. Defendant manufactures, markets, and distributes sandwiches, baked goods, and other 2 || prepared…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.