Carter
Carter v. JAI-PUT Enterprise Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DECATUER CARTER, Case No. 18-cv-06313-DMR
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR
9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10 JAI-PUT ENTERPRISE INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 47 11 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff Decatuer Carter brings employment-related claims against Defendants Jai-Put 13 Enterprise Inc. dba Junk King (“Junk King”) and Krishna Vepa, alleging violations of the Federal 14 Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., the California Labor Code, the California 15 Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq., and California common 16 law. [Docket No. 1 (“Compl.”).] Carter and Defendants both filed motions for summary judgment. 17 [Docket Nos. 47 (“Pltf. Mot.”); 48 (“Def. Opp.”), 50 (“Pltf. Reply”), 46 (“Def. Mot.”), 49 (“Pltf. 18 Opp.”), 51 (“Def. Reply”).] The court has determined that this matter may be determined on the 19 papers pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b). 20 For the reasons stated below, Carter’s motion is granted in…