(HC) Godfrey v. Warden PVSP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20205:20-cv-01381California1,408 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

JM GODFREY,

11 Case No. 20-01381 BLF (PR) Petitioner, 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING v. PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT; 13 DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

14 WARDEN PVSP,

15 Respondent. (Docket Nos. 11, 17) 16

17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the denial of resentencing under “SB 20 620.”1 Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Dkt. No. 16. 21 22 I. DISCUSSION 23 I. Standard of Review 24 This court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person 25 in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in 26 custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. 27 1 § 2254(a). It shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.