Sacchi

Sacchi v. Dervishi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20203:19-cv-06638California6,177 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARCO SACCHI, Case No. 19-cv-06638-SK

8 Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

9 v.

10 KLODJANA DERVISHI, 11 Respondent.

12 Before the Court is the petition filed by Petitioner Marco Sacchi (“Sacchi”) for the return 13 of his two minor children R.S. and A.S. to Italy pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil 14 Aspects of International Child Abduction, Oct. 25, 1980, 19 I.L.M. 1501 (“Convention”), as 15 implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), codified at 22 16 U.S.C. §§ 9001, et seq. (Dkt. No. 1.) 17 The Court has considered all of the evidence submitted during the bench trial, including 18 the testimony by Sacchi, Respondent Klodjana Dervishi (“Dervishi”), and expert witness S. 19 Margaret Lee, Ph.D. Having considered the evidence carefully, the Court now finds that R.S and 20 A.S were at the time of the alleged wrongful retention and now remain habitual residents of the 21 Italy, and GRANTS the Petition for their return. 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.