Dixon

Williams v. Dixon

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20205:20-cv-00673California989 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPHUS H. WILLIAMS,

Case No. 20-00673 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 13 LT. DIXON, Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at the California State Prison (“CSP”) in Solano, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted in a separate order. 21 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must, however, be liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.