McElroy

McElroy v. McLean

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20204:20-cv-01900California439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LATWAHN J. MCELROY, Case No. 20-cv-01900-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION

v. FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

MAUREEN MCLEAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court previously ordered plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be deemed three strikes barred and the application to proceed in forma pauperis denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order but failed to address the order to show cause. The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order and denied the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered plaintiff to pay the full filing fee or the case would be dismissed. Docket No. Plaintiff has not paid the full filing fee but has filed a second motion for a temporary restraining order and had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.