Scarlett

Scarlett v. Alemzadeh

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20205:19-cv-07466California3,613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SIDNEY THEODORE SCARLETT, Case No. 19-CV-07466-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. Re: Dkt. No. 11 AMIR REZA ALEMZADEH, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Sidney Theodore Scarlett (“Scarlett”) filed this pro se civil rights complaint against Defendant Amir Reza Alemzadeh (“Defendant” or “Alemzadeh”) and alleged violations of Scarlett’s constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment and Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Because the Complaint alleges constitutional violations that would affect a pending California criminal action against Scarlett, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice Scarlett’s claim for injunctive and declaratory relief. I. BACKGROUND Scarlett, proceeding pro se, alleges that in February 2015, he was unlawfully arrested and his residence was illegally searched without a search warrant in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Compl. at 10. Scarlett’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.