Mariano

Mariano v. Villa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20205:16-cv-03467California1,464 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CIRINA JUSTO MARIANO, et al., 8 Case No. 5:16-cv-03467-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR 10 RELIEF FROM CHARGING ORDER

ENRIQUE VALENCIA VILLA, AND MOTION TO QUASH

11 PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENA Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. No. 85

13 Before the Court is Non-Parties Enrique P. Villa, Javier Villa, And Rigoberto Villa’s 14 Motion For Relief From Charging Order And Motion To Quash Plaintiffs’ Subpoena For Records 15 To El Rancho Liquors. Dkt. No. 82. The Court has considered the parties’ papers and heard their 16 oral arguments. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion in part and 17 DENIES the motion in part. 18 I. Background 19 On July 27, 2017, Plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against Defendant Enrique V. 20 Villa (the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.