Wynn

Wynn v. Foulk

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20203:20-cv-00181California1,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAMUEL WYNN, Case No. 20-cv-00181-SI

Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. Re: Dkt. No. 1 FRED FOULK, et al., Respondents.

Petitioner Samuel Wynn, who is an inmate at the High Desert State Prison and who is represented by counsel, has filed this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. After Wynn did not file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge, the action was reassigned to the undersigned on May 18, 2020. Dkt. Nos. 6, 7. Wynn’s petition is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. 18 BACKGROUND The petition provides the following information. On August 24, 2015, the Alameda County District Attorney filed a two-count information, charging Samuel Wynn and two co-defendants with kidnapping to commit a sex crime (count one, Cal. Penal Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.