La Fosse v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PAM LA FOSSE1 et al., Case No. 19-cv-06570-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
SANDERSON FARMS, INC.,
13 Defendant.
I. INTRO DUCTION
16 Plaintiffs Pam La Fosse, Sharon Manier, Marybeth Norman, Starla McPeak, Laquita Hyatt, 17 Todd Hyatt, and Jonice Hyatt allege, on behalf of a putative nationwide class of consumers, that defendant Sanderson Farms engages in extensive, deceptive marketing of its chicken products. 20 Specifically, plaintiffs allege Sanderson markets its products as “100% Natural,” when they do not 21 meet a reasonable consumer’s expectation of what that would mean. Plaintiffs’ initial complaint 22 was dismissed with leave to amend in February 2020, and Sanderson now moves to dismiss 23 certain claims in the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for lack of personal jurisdiction and 24 failure to state a claim. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the hearing on the motion was
27 1 The…