Krypt, Inc. v. RoPaar LLC

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20205:19-cv-03226California5,584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 KRYPT, INC., Case No. 19-cv-03226-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

v. ROPAAR, LLC’S MOTION TO

DISMISS

ROPAAR LLC, et al., [Re: ECF 60] Defendants.

12 Krypt, Inc. (“Krypt”) brings this suit against its former employee Clay Robinson (“Robinson”) and Ropaar LLC (“Ropaar”) in connection with Robinson’s decision to leave Krypt’s employ and join Ropaar. Ropaar now moves to dismiss the claims against it under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Court heard oral arguments on May 21, 2020. For the reasons discussed below, Ropaar’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Unless otherwise noted, the following factual allegations are drawn from the First Amended Complaint, ECF 55 (“FAC”). Plaintiff Krypt is a California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.