Krypt, Inc. v. RoPaar LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 KRYPT, INC., Case No. 19-cv-03226-BLF
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
9 v. ROPAAR, LLC’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
10 ROPAAR LLC, et al., [Re: ECF 60] 11 Defendants.
12 13 Krypt, Inc. (“Krypt”) brings this suit against its former employee Clay Robinson 14 (“Robinson”) and Ropaar LLC (“Ropaar”) in connection with Robinson’s decision to leave Krypt’s 15 employ and join Ropaar. Ropaar now moves to dismiss the claims against it under Federal Rules 16 of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim 17 upon which relief can be granted. The Court heard oral arguments on May 21, 2020. For the reasons 18 discussed below, Ropaar’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Unless otherwise noted, the following factual allegations are drawn from the First Amended 21 Complaint, ECF 55 (“FAC”). 22 Plaintiff Krypt is a California…