Guy

Guy v. Pizzuti

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20203:20-cv-01936California1,353 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KENNETH CARL GUY, Case No. 20-cv-01936-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE TRO, RESCINDING ECF

9 v. PERMISSION AND IMPLEMENTING

PRE-FILE SCREENING

10 DALTON PIZZUTI, Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant. 11

12 13 On June 25, 2020, pro se plaintiff Kenneth Carl Guy filed a “motion for emergency 14 stay/T.R.O. and order to show cause” asking the Court to: (1) preserve “the Plaintiff's current 15 living situation for 14 days;” (2) order defendant Central City Hospitality House (“Hospitality 16 House”) to show cause as to why it should not pay his living expenses; and (3) order defendants 17 Newsmax Media, Inc. (“Newsmax”) and Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) to show cause for why they should not 18 compensate him for lost wages. Dkt. No. 16 at 12. The motion and all of the requests are denied. 19 In addition, Guy’s electronic case filing (“ECF”) privileges are rescinded pursuant to Magistrate 20 Judge Sallie Kim’s Order Striking Docket Entries 12 and 13. See Dkt. No. 14. 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.