Guy
Guy v. Pizzuti
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENNETH CARL GUY, Case No. 20-cv-01936-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE TRO, RESCINDING ECF
v. PERMISSION AND IMPLEMENTING
PRE-FILE SCREENING
DALTON PIZZUTI, Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant.
12 On June 25, 2020, pro se plaintiff Kenneth Carl Guy filed a “motion for emergency stay/T.R.O. and order to show cause” asking the Court to: (1) preserve “the Plaintiff's current living situation for 14 days;” (2) order defendant Central City Hospitality House (“Hospitality House”) to show cause as to why it should not pay his living expenses; and (3) order defendants Newsmax Media, Inc. (“Newsmax”) and Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) to show cause for why they should not compensate him for lost wages. Dkt. No. 16 at 12. The motion and all of the requests are denied. In addition, Guy’s electronic case filing (“ECF”) privileges are rescinded pursuant to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim’s Order Striking Docket Entries 12 and 13. See Dkt. No. 14. …