Melton

Melton v. Universal Cable Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20203:19-cv-07360California2,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIM MELTON, individually and on behalf of all aggrieved employees, No. C 19-07360 WHA Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER DENYING PARTIES’

UNIVERSAL CABLE HOLDINGS, INC., STIPULATION TO REMAND

dba SUDDENLINK COMMUNICATIONS, Defendant.

16 INTRODUCTION In this wage-and-hour PAGA action, the parties jointly stipulate to remand to Humboldt County Superior Court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, the parties’ stipulation is DENIED. STATEMENT Plaintiff Kim Melton worked for defendant Suddenlink Communications, a cable provider, from November 2016 to September 2018. She worked approximately forty hours per week at Suddenlink’s Eureka warehouse. The complaint alleges that plaintiff and other similarly aggrieved employees suffered several wage and hour violations under Suddenlink’s employ, including failure to compensate all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.