Silbersher

Silbersher v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20203:18-cv-01496California261 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZACHARY SILBERSHER, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-01496-JD Plaintiffs,

V. ORDER DISMISSING CASE

° VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC, et al., Defendants.

On May 11, 2020, the Court dismissed the corrected first amended complaint (““CFAC”) || with leave to amend by June 15, 2020. Dkt. No. 109 at 18. The Court expressly stated that failure || to meet this deadline would result in dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil || Procedure 41(b). Jd. Silbersher did not amend the complaint, and filed a notice of appeal on || June 9, 2020. Dkt. No. 110. He did not file a formal notice electing to stand on the complaint and || appeal, but left messages to that effect with the Court’s deputy on voicemail and email. A good argument can be made that Silbersher did not adequately respond to the Court’s order setting a deadline to amend, and that the case should be dismissed under Rule 41(b). See …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.