Hanson
Hanson v. Welch Foods Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CURTIS HANSON, Case No. 20-cv-02011-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
WELCH FOODS INC., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Curtis Hanson asserts consumer protection and breach of warranty claims under California law based on his allegations that Defendant Welch Foods Inc. (“Welch’s”) falsely represented that certain grape juice products support heart health when they in fact increase the risk of heart disease. Welch’s moves to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing previously set for 9:30 AM on July 10, 2020. The case management conference previously set for the same time is CONTINUED to 2:00 PM the same day. For the reasons discussed below, Welch’s motion is GRANTED in part, and Hanson’s consumer protection claims under California’s False…