Easton

Easton v. Wells Fargo & Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20204:20-cv-02193California3,203 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPHINE EASTON, Case No. 20-cv-02193-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

CHANGE VENUE

v.

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendants Wells Fargo & Company (“WFC”) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“WFB,” and together with WFC, “Defendants”) motion to transfer venue to the Central District of California. Dkt. No. 15 (“Mot.”). On May 14, 2020, Plaintiff Josephine Easton (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. Dkt. No. 17 (“Opp.”). Defendants replied on May 21, 2020. Dkt. No. 18 (“Reply”). After carefully considering the parties’ arguments, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to transfer venue to the Central District of California. 1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a resident of Riverside, California. Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 5. Plaintiff alleges that she was employed “by Defendant”—Plaintiff does not specify which Defendant—in various positions as a non-exempt “Loan Adjuster” at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.