Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Zenisco, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20204:19-cv-05198California2,587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE Case No. 19-cv-05198-HSG

COMPANY,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiff, STAY 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 34 10 ZENISCO, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Atain Insurance Company (“Atain”) brings this insurance coverage action against Defendants Zenisco, Inc. (“Zenisco”), its officers, Shahrokh Riahinezhad and Shahrooz Taebi, and 3S Network, Inc. (“3S”). Atain seeks rescission of the insurance policy issued to Zenisco, and declaratory judgments that it has no obligation to defend or indemnify Zenisco or its officers against claims for damages asserted in state court actions filed by 3S. Pending before the Court is Zenisco, Riahinezhad, and Taebi’s motion to stay Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 34 (“Mot.”), 37 (“Opp.”), 38 (“Reply”). The Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. The Policy On October 12, 2015, Defendant Riahinezhad completed an application for commercial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.