Windom
Windom v. Drug Enforcement Administration
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Cameron Windom, pro se,1 asserts that Defendants the Drug Enforcement 14 Administration (“DEA”) and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (“ATF”) failed to comply 15 with requests under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Good cause 16 having been shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Windom’s application to proceed in forma 17 pauperis. See dkt. 2. Because Windom’s complaint does not include sufficient factual allegations 18 to state a claim on which relief may be granted, however, Windom is ORDERED TO SHOW 19 CAUSE why his complaint should not be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). No
21 1 Windom is not a stranger to this Court. On January 22, 2019, Judge Seeborg dismissed a case against numerous federal officers and agencies where Windom asked the court to “exercise the 22 honesty motion that can assure control over all corrupt policies, proceedings, and irrational laws.” Windom v. Hatch, No. 18-cv-07660-RS, 2019 WL 1095809 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2019), adopting 23 recommendation, 2019 WL 1095831 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2019) (Laporte, M.J.). On June 27, 2019, Judge Freeman dismissed a complaint where Windom…