Doe

Doe v. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20201:20-cv-02263California6,739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 JOHN DOE, Case No. 20-cv-02263-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., Defendants.

13 In early April of 2020, Petitioner, an asylum seeker, filed a habeas corpus petition as well as a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) seeking his immediate release from the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) at the Yuba County Jail. See Pet. (dkt. 1); and, Pet.’s Mot. (dkt. 13). Following a round of briefing by the parties, the court granted Petitioner’s motion for a temporary restraining order (dkt. 31) and ordered Respondents to release Petitioner (dkt. 33) from custodial confinement at the Yuba County Jail pursuant to a series of conditions of release. Thereafter, at a hearing on May 5, 2020, the court ordered Respondents to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not issue, for which the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.