Windom
Windom v. Environmental Protection Agency
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAMERON WINDOM, Case No. 20-cv-02826-JCS
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE AGENCY, et al., DISMISSED 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Cameron Windom, pro se, asserts that Defendants the Environmental Protection 13 Agency (“EPA”), Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and Department of 14 Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) failed to comply with requests under the Freedom of 15 Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby 16 GRANTS Windom’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. See dkt. 2. 17 Windom’s complaint in this action is virtually identical to a complaint that he filed against 18 the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms 19 (“ATF”), assigned case number 20-cv-02431. Notably, the present complaint includes language 20 from that case, which Windom presumably…