Crisco

Crisco v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20203:19-cv-07320California513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA CRISCO, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 19-07320 WHA

v.

FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER RE STIPULATION TO SET GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN, and BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOREMOST PROPERTY AND

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 Defendants.

17 By stipulation, the parties request a briefing schedule to guide prospective motions for partial summary judgment limited to purely legal, insurance coverage issues. Early resolution of the legal issues, the parties agree, would be in the best interest of the elderly plaintiffs displaced by fire damage to their mobile homes — the insured property at issue here — during the 2017 Sonoma Complex fires. The parties propose plaintiff bring one motion followed by defendants’ opposition and an additional motion from defendants “addressing the insurance coverage issue raised by [p]laintiffs’ motion” (Dkt. No. 35) (emphasis added). Briefing would extend into September, defendants having the final reply, followed by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.