Crisco
Crisco v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PATRICIA CRISCO, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 19-07320 WHA
v.
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER RE STIPULATION TO SET GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN, and BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOREMOST PROPERTY AND
CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
15 Defendants.
17 By stipulation, the parties request a briefing schedule to guide prospective motions for partial summary judgment limited to purely legal, insurance coverage issues. Early resolution of the legal issues, the parties agree, would be in the best interest of the elderly plaintiffs displaced by fire damage to their mobile homes — the insured property at issue here — during the 2017 Sonoma Complex fires. The parties propose plaintiff bring one motion followed by defendants’ opposition and an additional motion from defendants “addressing the insurance coverage issue raised by [p]laintiffs’ motion” (Dkt. No. 35) (emphasis added). Briefing would extend into September, defendants having the final reply, followed by a…