Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20205:17-cv-04467California523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

FILE UNDER SEAL

SONICWALL, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 256, 257 Defendant.

13 In connection with a discovery dispute concerning plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) assertions of attorney-client privilege and attorney work product protection with respect to portions of and exhibits to the depositions of four witnesses who provided testimony in a separate litigation (Dkt. No. 248), the parties moved to file under seal the exhibits to the supplemental declarations filed in support of their respective positions. Dkt. Nos. 256, 257. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court grants the administrative motions to file under seal, as set forth below. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and documents accompanying dispositive motions that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.