Nobles

Nobles v. Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20205:19-cv-07362California1,610 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 KATHLEEN NOBLES, Case No. 19-cv-07362-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

FRED M. KERN, et al., [Re: ECF 44] Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Kathleen Nobles brings this suit against Defendants Fred Kern and Plum Holdings, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) alleging a breach of contract. Compl. ECF 1. On March 5, 2020, Defendants filed a Motion to Transfer Venue (“Motion”) to the Middle District of Florida. ECF 44. On April 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed her Opposition to the Motion to Change Venue (“Opp’n”). ECF 59. Defendants have not filed a reply. The Motion is DENIED for the reasons stated below. I. BACKGROUND On November 7, 2019, Plaintiff Nobles filed a complaint against Defendants in the Northern District of California alleging breach of an August 1, 2015, Promissory Note Agreement (the “Agreement”) for $1.5 million. Compl., ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.