Hudson

Hudson v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20203:19-cv-07490California2,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TORIANO GERMAINE HUDSON, Case No. 19-cv-07490-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 13 ROBERT NEUSCHMID, et al., Defendants.

12 13 Toriano Germaine Hudson, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court reviewed his complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend. He then filed an amended complaint that is now before the court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 18 BACKGROUND This action concerns family visits, which are defined as “extended overnight visits, provided for eligible inmates and their immediate family members as defined in Section 3000.” Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3177. The amended complaint alleges that correctional counselor Nguyen at San Quentin State Prison denied Hudson’s request for family visits on the basis that Hudson did not qualify for family visits due to a 2000 conviction for a violation of California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.