Sepehry-Fard
Sepehry-Fard v. Lee
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 13, 20205:20-cv-03585California1,063 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
FAREED SEPEHRY-FARD,
Case No. 5:20-cv-03585-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S IFP 1] APPLICATION DEPUTY H. LEE et al., a Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant. 2B
Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Fareed Sepehry-Fard’s motion for leave to proceed in © forma pauperis (“IFP”). See Dkt. 4. This Court previously granted in part and denied in part Q 16 || Plaintiff’s IFP application. See Dkt. 13. The Court found that Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims
|| against Defendants Deputy H. Lee, Deputy McRoberts, and Sheriff Laurie Smith (the “Sheriff
Defendants”) could proceed. However, Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Amar R. Patel, || Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Jan T. Chilton, Jospeh W. Guzzetta, Adam N.…