Pirnik

Pirnik v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20203:19-cv-03976California6,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIMOTHY P., Case No. 19-cv-03976-EMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

ANDREW M. SAUL, CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendant. Docket Nos. 18, 21 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Timothy P. (“Mr. P”) seeks to reverse the 2018 decision (“2018 ALJ Decision”) by Administrative Law Judge Patrick Hannon (“ALJ Hannon”) that denied Mr. P disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Mr. P alleged disability beginning May 20, 2012 (the alleged onset date) through June 30, 2012 (Mr. P’s last date insured). Applying res judicata from a prior unfavorable ALJ decision (“2012 ALJ decision”), ALJ Hannon found that Mr. P did not overcome the presumption of continuing nondisability, which arises in disability proceedings that follow a previous ALJ’s finding of nondisability. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.