Choudhuri

Choudhuri v. Specialised Loan Servicing

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20203:19-cv-04198California1,760 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KABITA CHOUDHURI, Case No. 3:19-cv-04198-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 21 SPECIALISED LOAN SERVICING, et al., Defendants.

12 Pro se plaintiff Choudhuri alleges claims under federal and state law against two defendants, Specialised Loan Servicing and Bosco Credit LLC (“Bosco”), over their servicing of her mortgage loans. The Court dismissed the original complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on its own motion. Dkt. No. 6. Choudhuri’s motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction was denied in the same order. Id. Defendant Bosco’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint was granted in a bench ruling. Dkt. No. 17. Choudhuri filed a second amended complaint. Dkt. No. 20 (“SAC”). Bosco has moved to dismiss the SAC under Rule 12(b)(6). Dkt. No. 21. The Court found the motion to be suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Dkt. No. 25. The parties are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.