In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20204:18-cv-01885California1,625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 4:18-cv-01885-HSG-EDL

LITIGATION

STIPULATED AND UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V. and U.S. Philips Corporation (collectively, “Philips”) and Defendants HTC Corp. and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, “HTC”) have entered into a confidential settlement agreement resolving all claims between them in this action (“the Philips/HTC Claims”). Therefore, Philips and HTC jointly file this motion under Civil L.R. 7-12 asking the Court to enter the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal filed herewith, which dismisses the Philips/HTC Claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) (“Rule 41(a)(2)”) under the terms set forth in that Stipulation of Dismissal. Of note, counsel for Philips has met and conferred with counsel for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.