Gastelo

Johnson v. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20203:20-cv-01595California1,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRELL EUGENE JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-01595-WHO (PR)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

JOSIE GASTELO, Respondent. Dkt. Nos. 2 and

16 INTRODUCTION Petitioner Darrell Eugene Johnson seeks federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 after the state courts denied his request for early parole consideration under Proposition 57, which provides such consideration for persons convicted of non-violent felonies. However, Johnson is statutorily ineligible under Proposition 57 because his commitment offense of robbery is considered a violent felony. Because Johnson is ineligible for early parole consideration, he never had a due process liberty interest that the state denied. On such a record, no federal habeas claim has been stated. If Johnson believes he can overcome this barrier to federal habeas relief, he may file an amended petition on or before September 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.