The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20203:18-cv-01199California1,530 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Case No. 18-cv-01199-VC

LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR

UNIVERSITY,

ORDER #2 RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR

Plaintiff, SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 106, 114, 120, 123

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

The parties have filed two sets of cross-motions for summary judgment: one between Stanford and HP/Agilent, and one between HP/Agilent and Nokia. This order resolves some of the simpler issues presented: Part I addresses those between Stanford and HP/Agilent; Part II addresses those between HP/Agilent and Nokia. The remaining (and more challenging) issues will be decided closer to the trial date. The trial was scheduled for August of this year, but civil trials have been postponed because of the public health crisis. A revised schedule will be discussed at the case management conference scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on August 12. I. 1. Stanford’s SJ Motion, Sections 1, 7 –11, 13–17 of Part III.C (Dkt. No. 106). HP has not opposed Stanford’s motion with respect to affirmative defenses 1, 13, 17–20, 23–26, 28–29, 31–37 raised in its answer, so those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.