Hernandez

Hernandez v. Dutton Ranch Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20203:19-cv-00817California636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OMAR HERNANDEZ, et al., Case No. 19-cv-00817-EMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO RETAIN

v. CONFIDENTIALITY AND MOTION

FOR AMENDED PROTECTIVE

DUTTON RANCH CORPORATION, et al., ORDER Defendants. Docket No.

12 13 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to retain confidentiality and for an amended protective order. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and therefore VACATES the hearing on the motion. The motion for relief is GRANTED in its entirety. With respect to the confidentiality designations, Plaintiffs’ designations were timely made. Although the Court would have preferred that the parties bring the dispute regarding the designations to the Court’s attention via a joint letter, that is not a reason to deny Plaintiffs any relief, particularly as Plaintiffs did not act in bad faith given the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.