Cooper

Cooper v. Curallux LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20204:20-cv-02455California3,630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANICE COOPER, Case No. 20-cv-02455-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

TRANSFER

CURALLUX LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendant.

13 Before the court is defendant Curallux LLC’s (“Curallux” or “defendant”) motion to transfer venue. The matter is fully briefed1 and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby DENIES defendant’s motion for the following reasons. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Janice Cooper (“plaintiff”) filed this putative class action against defendant on April 10, 2020 asserting claims for violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, violation of the California False Advertising Law, violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, breach of express warranty, and unjust enrichment. Dkt. 1. 24 1 After defendant filed its reply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.