RingCentral, Inc. v. Nextiva, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 RINGCENTRAL, INC., Case No. 19-cv-02626-NC 11 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
12 v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE COUNTERCLAIMS NEXTIVA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 72 Defendants.
16 Before the Court is plaintiff RingCentral, Inc.’s motion to dismiss and strike Nextiva, Inc.’s counterclaims. Dkt. No. 72. RingCentral argues that Nextiva’s counterclaims contain the same errors that led to the dismissal of RingCentral’s original complaint. The Court finds that Nextiva has sufficiently alleged its false advertising claims and its unfair competition claim, but fails to state sufficient facts to allege trade libel and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART RingCentral’s motion to dismiss Nextiva’s counterclaims. I. Background A. Factual Allegations The facts alleged in the…