Hilario Pankim v. Barr
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PASCUAL HILARIO PANKIM,
Case No. 20-cv-02941-JSC Petitioner, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Respondents.
12 Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 16.) Having considered the Motion, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s Motion without prejudice to resubmission. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1)(C) requires a party to “state the issues that the party intends to present on appeal.” These issues must be phrased in the “typical form of an issue for the court of appeals—that is, [they must] set forth a specific contention or question regarding an alleged error on the part of the district court warranting review.” Garfield v. Astrue, No. C 03-4124 VRW, 2009 WL 1975382 at *1 (N.D. Cal. July 8, 2009). The Motion states only that it will file a notice of appeal…