Domokos
Domokos v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIUS DOMOKOS, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00336-SVK
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT AND GRANTING
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 16, 17 Defendant.
This case involves claims by Plaintiffs Marius Domokos and Lex Kosowsky that Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company wrongfully denied them coverage under a directors’ and officers’ (“D&O”) liability insurance policy issued to Plaintiffs’ former employer, Shocking 14 Technologies, Inc. (“Shocking”), for claims brought against Plaintiffs in a pending state court 15 action. Dkt. 14 (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)) ¶ 1. Scottsdale now seeks to dismiss the 16 FAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Dkt. 16. In 17 support of its motion to dismiss, Scottsdale also filed a request for judicial notice. Dkt. 17. The 18 parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt.…