Ochoa

Ochoa v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20204:20-cv-02306California1,743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL OCHOA, Case No. 20-cv-02306-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING FDCPA CLAIM

v. AND GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND

T-MOBILE USA, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 13 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand, which includes a request to file an amended complaint to omit the federal cause of action. ECF No. 13. The Court will grant Plaintiff’s request to amend the complaint and remand this action to the Superior Court of California. I. BACKGROUND On February 19, 2020, pro se Plaintiff Daniel Ochoa filed this lawsuit against T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”), Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. (“Convergent”), and Assurant Solutions, Inc. (“Assurant”) (collectively, “Defendants”) in the Superior Court of California, San Francisco County. ECF No. 1-1 ¶¶ 2-4. Ochoa’s complaint includes six causes of action: (1) defamation; (2) violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1770, et seq.; …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.