Boyle

Boyle v. California State University Employees Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20203:19-cv-00426California1,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERESA BOYLE, et al., Case No. 19-cv-00426-VC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Re: Dkt. No. 159 EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Defendants.

The plaintiffs have filed a third amended complaint, and the SEIU defendants (the only remaining defendants) have moved to dismiss parts of that complaint. The motion is granted. 1. The plaintiffs themselves point out that Don Weber and Elizabeth McAdams lack standing to seek prospective relief on Counts 2 and 3, and Jamie Snyder lacks standing to seek prospective relief on Count 2. These aspects of these claims are accordingly dismissed on that basis. 2. The parties agree that the claims for prospective injunctive and declaratory relief on Counts 2 and 3 are moot under the reasoning of the Court’s earlier order in this case. See Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 152. The plaintiffs have thus waived any arguments that there are relevant differences, for purposes of mootness, between the prospective claims discussed in the prior order and the prospective claims at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.