Roach
Roach v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER R., Case No. 19-cv-03921-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 24 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christopher R. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 18 (Pl.’s Mot.), 24 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16- 5, the motions have been submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion, and REMANDS for further proceedings consistent with this Order. II.…