Roach

Roach v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20203:19-cv-03921-TSHCalifornia8,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER R., Case No. 19-cv-03921-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 24 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christopher R. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 18 (Pl.’s Mot.), 24 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16- 5, the motions have been submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion, and REMANDS for further proceedings consistent with this Order. II.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.