Sayce
Sayce v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER L. SAYCE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00076-SI
Plaintiffs,
ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASES
v. AND REPUBLISH PSLRA NOTICE
FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et Re: Dkt. Nos. 35, 44 al., 11 Defendants. 12 Now before the Court is Lead Plaintiff Meitav Tachlit Mutual Funds, Ltd.’s (“Meitav Tachlit”) Motion to Consolidate Cases and Vacate Notice and Lead Plaintiff Deadline (“Motion to Consolidate”). Dkt. No. 35. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and General Order No. 72-4, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the July 24, 2020 hearing. Having considered the arguments presented in the papers, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Meitav Tachlit’s motion. The Court hereby CONSOLIDATES Case Nos. 3:20- cv-00076-SI and 3:20-cv-03819-SI, VACATES its order appointing Meitav Tachlit as lead plaintiff and appointing lead counsel (Dkt. No. 27), and ORDERS that Meitav Tachlit republish notice to …