Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20205:17-cv-04467California3,374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

v. PRIVILEGE CLAIMS

SONICWALL, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 248 Defendant.

13 Defendant SonicWall, Inc. (“SonicWall”) disputes plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) assertions of attorney-client privilege and attorney work product protection with respect to portions of and exhibits to the depositions of four witnesses who provided testimony in a separate litigation between Finjan and Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”). SonicWall moves to compel production of those materials. Finjan argues that the disputed materials are protected from disclosure and that they are not relevant. Dkt. No. 248. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions dated April 17 and May 4, 2020, including Finjan’s submission of the disputed exhibits for in camera review, as well as the arguments presented at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.