Martin

Martin v. Muniz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20205:17-cv-01690California1,560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE MARTIN,

Case No. 17-01690 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION v. FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION AND

W. MUNIZ, et al., CONTEMPT CITATION

Defendants. (Docket No. 143)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). The operative complaint is the second amended complaint, Dkt. No. 129, and the only claim in this matter is the Eighth Amendment claim concerning Plaintiff’s pain management, including the denial of corrective surgery to address the chronic pain, against Defendants Dr. Kim R. Kumar, Dr. Darrin M. Bright, Tuan Anh Tran, Dr. Edward Miles Birdsong, and Dr. Jennifer Villa. Dkt. No. 137 at 7. Before Defendants filed their motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 149,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.